We adopt so that we can provide a suitable lifestyle and unconditional love to a child. I do believe that a main criteria must be that the adopter is able to provide the same situation for their own self. We always hear about helping others, but it is also important that we make sure we, as well, are taken care of. Having our own stable life allows us to pass that particular lifestyle to those whom we adopt. Of course there are other factors, I simply believe that this one idea is important before considering adoption.
Now I know there is a big debate over whether or not gay couples should be able to adopt. I have always said that I am amazed by the passion that the gay community has about marriage and family. I am not saying its non-existent, but it's sometimes hard to find that same kind of passion in straight couples these days. If a homosexual couple is stable they should be able to adopt. I could actually go on and on about this topic, though, given the circumstances, I'll end it here and perhaps continue in the comments section.
Submitted by Damian Trudell, Visit his blog - "My Thoughts"
#2 In The Words of a T-Shirt
Who can adopt? Any person or couple who can provide a stable, loving home to children in need. This includes gay couples, single parents, and older people. In the words of a t-shirt I saw recently, "Two dads are better than none." Anyone willing to give a home to a child in need deserves a medal, not a hard time.
Submitted by Amanda Rogers, Esq. Visit her blog - Seven Eighty One.
#3 More Questions
This week’s topic gave me more questions than answers:
- Why do I have a problem with uber-celebrities adopting children from foreign countries?
- Why do I think homosexuals will raise homosexual children?
- How do you become capable of deciding, “Who can adopt?”
- Are children actually “better off” with adoptive parents – or would they have been better with their natural parents, regardless of the circumstances…?
- Do I think I am capable of adopting children? And, would I be considered capable of adopting children?
- Should there be limits on the number of children a family (or person) can adopt?
- Does providing financial compensation for providers of foster-care discourage families from adopting (because there is no $$ in it…)?
Submitted by Jason L. Buchanan. Visit his Facebook Profile.
#4 An Act of Love
Adoption is an act of love. No matter what kind of adoption is performed. It is an act that willfully represents the unselfish act of love and kindness that is bestowed upon one another or even for any other living, breathing, object.
If the world would only open their eyes and hearts to the many different needs in society besides their own, we would undoubtedly realize the need to adopt those less fortunate or those looking for a loving home that will adequately provide a loving roof over their head, or a nurturing environment to help with their development.
Who should adopt? This question leaves open many difficult answers from different sects or groups. Today’s society has the notion that homosexuals should not be allowed to adopt children into their homes because of the lifestyles and values that the particular environment may present upon the child. Although, I partially agree with this thought, I do again have to go back to the main essential needs of the child or children being adopted by such groups or any groups. If there is an abundant amount of love, respect, discipline, adequate care and concern in the homes of people privileged to adopt, then, I would not have a problem allowing such groups or anybody extending their arms to receive or adopt a child that is homeless, needing these qualities. Many would disagree with homosexuals adopting, especially the religious groups who would point it back to the bible. The fact of the matter is this, if many heterosexuals disagree with homosexuals adopting, then more heterosexuals should be at the fore front of the issue and adopt more children into their home and provide the perfect environment to raise up and adopt children without a loving, nurturing home. It is simply just an unselfish act of love being extended to those less fortunate.
Submitted by Kristine Ogbolu.
If the world would only open their eyes and hearts to the many different needs in society besides their own, we would undoubtedly realize the need to adopt those less fortunate or those looking for a loving home that will adequately provide a loving roof over their head, or a nurturing environment to help with their development.
Who should adopt? This question leaves open many difficult answers from different sects or groups. Today’s society has the notion that homosexuals should not be allowed to adopt children into their homes because of the lifestyles and values that the particular environment may present upon the child. Although, I partially agree with this thought, I do again have to go back to the main essential needs of the child or children being adopted by such groups or any groups. If there is an abundant amount of love, respect, discipline, adequate care and concern in the homes of people privileged to adopt, then, I would not have a problem allowing such groups or anybody extending their arms to receive or adopt a child that is homeless, needing these qualities. Many would disagree with homosexuals adopting, especially the religious groups who would point it back to the bible. The fact of the matter is this, if many heterosexuals disagree with homosexuals adopting, then more heterosexuals should be at the fore front of the issue and adopt more children into their home and provide the perfect environment to raise up and adopt children without a loving, nurturing home. It is simply just an unselfish act of love being extended to those less fortunate.
Submitted by Kristine Ogbolu.
#5 Anyone
Anyone who has love to give. Yep, I said anyone. That of course does not include pedophiles but other than that ... Anyone. I don't care if you are married, straight or gay. Why should we decide who is "worthy" of being a parent? If you have love in your heart to share and the means to take care of that child then I'm not stopping you. People who have far less to give a child are already parents.
Submitted by Tabitha Frohardt-Johnson. Visit her blog, TFJ Photography {Beautifully You}.
Anyone who has love to give. Yep, I said anyone. That of course does not include pedophiles but other than that ... Anyone. I don't care if you are married, straight or gay. Why should we decide who is "worthy" of being a parent? If you have love in your heart to share and the means to take care of that child then I'm not stopping you. People who have far less to give a child are already parents.
Submitted by Tabitha Frohardt-Johnson. Visit her blog, TFJ Photography {Beautifully You}.
#6 No One
Parents just screw kids up - to some degree. All parents, all kids. Even those with the best intentions. Why should anyone be able to screw kids up that aren't really theirs? They shouldn't. But, I guess the alternative is for countless kids wandering around homeless. No one wants that, so we allow people to adopt - when that is really not preferred.
Submitted by Anonymous.
Parents just screw kids up - to some degree. All parents, all kids. Even those with the best intentions. Why should anyone be able to screw kids up that aren't really theirs? They shouldn't. But, I guess the alternative is for countless kids wandering around homeless. No one wants that, so we allow people to adopt - when that is really not preferred.
Submitted by Anonymous.
